Invecchiamento e divari di genere nell’uso degli strumenti di eHealth
Keywords:
Gender digital divide, eHealth, access to healthcareAbstract
Aging and Gender divide in the Use of eHealth Tools
The outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic and the safety measures implemented to contain the health emergency have caused the sudden and exponential implementation of the use of all eHealth tools and telemedicine technologies, which, although present in the pre-pandemic period, were only marginally utilized. The existence of disparities in the use of digital tools, reflecting a generational dimension and constituting a "gray digital divide," has effects on multiple levels of inequality in the access and utilization of such tools. In particular, a gender analysis highlights a digital gap in favor of men in all age groups ex-cept for the "digital natives," and it shows that this gap increases with age. Furthermore, the prevalence of the female component in the elderly population, due to a higher life expec-tancy, and the higher incidence of chronic diseases and morbidity they experience make them the primary users of care and prevention services. They also play a significant role in the demand for socio-healthcare services, particularly as caregivers for non-self-sufficient individuals. The research conducted at the University Hospital of Pisa, aimed to examine differences in the usage experiences eHealth tools during the 2020 lockdown. The study also sought to investigate whether and to what extent these new modes of healthcare ac-cess have presented specific challenges for the female population.
References
Accorinti, M., & Pugliese, E. (a cura di). (2015). Generazioni solidali. Giovani e anziani nell’Italia della crisi. Roma: Liberetà.
Ardissone, A. (2018). La relazione medico-paziente nella sanità digitale. Possibili impatti sul professionalismo medico. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 59(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1423/89355.
Biancheri, R., & Pellizzoni, L. (2021). Scienza in discussione? Dalla controversia sui vac-cini all’emergenza Covid-19. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Biancheri, R., & Taddei, S. (2018). Narrare la malattia per costruire la salute. Pisa: Pisa University Press.
Cavalcante, R. B., Esteves, C. J., Pires, M., Vasconcelos, D. D., Freitas, M. D., & Macedo, A. S. (2017). The actor-network theory as a theoretical-methodological framework in health and nursing research. Texto & Contexto – Enfermagem, 26(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-07072017000910017.
Cipolla, C., & Maturo, A. (a cura di). (2014). Sociologia della salute e web society. Mila-no: FrancoAngeli.
Clemente, C., & García Pereiro, T. (2020). Introduzione alla sociologia dei corsi di vita. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Cockerham, W.C. (2005). Health Lifestyle Theory and the Convergence of Agency and Structure. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650504600105.
Commissione Europea. (2012). Report on the public consultation on eHealth Action Plan 2012-2020. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/report-publicconsultation- ehealth-action-plan-2012-2020.
Eisenbach, G. (2001). What is eHealth? Journal of Medical Internet Research, 3(2), e20. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3.2.e20.
Elder, G.H., George, L.K. (2016). Age, Cohorts, and the Life Course. In: Shanahan, M., Mortimer, J., Kirkpatrick Johnson, M. (Eds.): Handbook of the Life Course. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20880-0_3
Farre, A., Fang, M., Hannah, B., Makita, M., McFadden, A., Menezes, D., Rodriguez, A., Sixsmith, J., & Gray, N.M. (2023). Exploring the use of digital technology to deliver healthcare services with explicit consideration of health inequalities in UK settings: A scoping review. Digital Health, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231185442
Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana. (2022). Approvazione delle linee guida organizzative contenenti il «Modello digitale per l’attuazione dell’assistenza domiciliare». Gazzetta Ufficiale, Serie Generale, 120. https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2022/05/24/22A03098/sg
Governo Italiano. (2021). Piano nazionale di ripresa e resilienza (PNRR). https://www.governo.it/sites/governo.it/files/PNRR.pdf
ISTAT. (2020). Invecchiamento attivo e condizioni di vita degli anziani in Italia. Roma: ISTAT.
ISTAT. (2021, luglio). Le condizioni di salute della popolazione anziana in Italia. Anno 2019. Tratto il giorno Aprile 15, 2022 da https://www.istat.it/it/files/2021/07/Report-anziani-2019.pdf
Latour, B. (2022). Riassemblare il sociale: Actor-Network theory. Milano: Mimesis.
Longo, F., & Maino, F. (2021). Platoform Welfare. Nuove logiche per innovare i servizi lo-cali. Milano: Egea.
Lopez, A. M., Lam, K, & Thota, R. (2021) Barriers and Facilitators to Telemedicine: Can You Hear Me Now?. American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book. 41, 25-36. DOI:10.1200/EDBK_320827
Lusardi, R., Radin, A., & Tomelleri, S. (2018). E come engagement. Il coinvolgimento di pazienti e professionisti come fattore di sviluppo dei processi di eHealth. Politiche So-ciali, (2), 163–178. https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.7389/90592
McAuley, A. (2014). Digital health interventions: widening access or widening inequali-ties? Public Health, 128(12), 1118–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2014.09.004
Ministero della Salute (2021). I sistemi di intelligenza artificiale come strumento di sup-porto alla diagnostica. Sezione V. Consiglio Superiore di Sanità.
Moen, P. (1996). A life course perspective on retirement, gender, and well- being, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.1.2.131
Morsello, B., Cilona, C., & Misale, F. (2017). Medicina narrativa. Temi, esperienze e rifles-sioni. Roma: RomaTrE-Press.
Murero, M., & Moretti, V. (2021). “L’innovazione digitale per la governance del SSN. Pro-blemi e proposte”. In G. Vicarelli & G. Giarelli (a cura di), Libro Bianco Il Servizio Sa-nitario Nazionale e la pandemia da Covid-19 (pp. 105-110). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Perra, M. S. (2014). “Essere malati e malate. Pratiche di resistenza nella cronicità”. In C. Cipolla, & A. Maturo, Sociologia della salute e web society (pp. 286-305). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Plan International & Università Bocconi. (2021). Sfide attuali e future per la Parità di Ge-nere in Italia: Il divario digitale di genere, https://www.plan-international.it/files/Il_divario_digitale_di_genere_20210225_baja.pdf
UNESCO, OECD, & IDB. (2022). The Effects of AI on the Working Lives of Women. UNESCO; Inter-American Development Bank; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris: UNESCO/OECD.
World Health Organization. (2002). Active ageing: a policy framework. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/67215
World Health Organization. (2021). World health statistics 2021: monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals I. Geneva: Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
Yao, R., Zhang, W., Evans, R., Cao, G., Rui, T., & Shen, L. (2022). Inequities in health care services caused by the adoption of digital health technologies: scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(3), e34144. https://doi.org/10.2196/34144
